For the second time in two years, the Little Sisters of the Poor are asking the Supreme Court to protect them from a government that is intent on forcing religious institutions to pay for medical services which violate their conscience.

According to The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a public interest law firm, the Little Sisters of the Poor and other non-profits have been forced to ask the Court for relief from oppressive fines for refusing to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives, abortifacients and sterilization to their female employees.

“The government has lost every single time they have made these arguments before the Supreme Court—including last year’s landmark Hobby Lobby case. One would think they would get the message and stop pressuring the Sisters,” said Mark Rienzi, Senior Counsel of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and lead attorney for the Little Sisters of the Poor. “The government is willing to exempt big companies like Exxon, Chevron, and Pepsi Bottling, but it won’t leave the Little Sisters alone.”

The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and leading Supreme Court advocate Paul Clement—the same legal team that won Hobby Lobby—filed the petition on behalf of the Little Sisters as well as the Christian Brothers Employee Benefit Trust, Christian Brothers Services, Reaching Souls International, Truett-McConnell College, and GuideStone Financial Resources of the Southern Baptist Convention. They are seeking relief from a 100-page decision by the Tenth Circuit that disagrees with the ministries’ understanding of moral theology.

The Sister’s petition is the fifth the Supreme Court has received thus far and makes it very likely the Court will decide in the upcoming term whether religious ministries, like religious for-profits, will receive protection from the controversial Mandate.

“The Sisters consider it immoral to help the government distribute these drugs. But instead of simply exempting them, the government insists that it can take over their ministry’s employee healthcare to distribute these drugs to their employees, while dismissing the Sisters’ moral objections as irrelevant,” said Rienzi. “In America, judges and government bureaucrats have no authority to tell the Little Sisters what is moral or immoral. And the government can distribute its drugs without nuns—it has its own healthcare exchanges that can provide whatever it wants.”

Sr. Loraine Marie Maguire, Mother Provincial of the Little Sisters of the Poor agrees. “As Little Sisters of the Poor we dedicate our lives to serving the neediest in society, with love and dignity. We perform this loving ministry because of our faith and simply cannot choose between our care for the elderly poor and our faith, and we shouldn’t have to. We hope the Supreme Court will hear our case and ensure that people from diverse faiths can freely follow God’s calling in their lives.”

The Court is likely to consider all of the petitions in late September or early October. If the petition is granted, the case would be argued and decided before the end of the Court’s term in June 2016.

© All Rights Reserved, Living His Life Abundantly®/Women of Grace® http://www.womenofgrace.com